“There is consumer pressure to back away from technology that is unnecessary to perform everyday tasks.”

  • ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    So the only reason they can build this and not have to conform to pollution laws is because they’re using remanned Cummins 12v engines. There’s a limited number of those in any case. As soon as they have to conform with new engines, they’re going to get a lot more expensive.

    Caterpiller stopped providing truck engines for a decade rather than R&D a compliant motor. That was the second largest truck engine manufacturer in the world, decided it was too expensive to bother, which tells you how much these engines cost new.

    I love the idea of this tractor, but it’s not going to survive the economy of scale intact.

    • modus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      What regulations must they conform to with newly-manufactured engines? Emmissions? Safety?

      Are ag equipment regulations so strict that they can’t manufacture new “old-school” engines?

      Serious question as I am not a farmer. Not anymore at least. Not since my horse died. RIP, Mr. Sugarhooves.

      • ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        NO2 emissions standards in US and Canada now pretty much require DEF systems, which is a huge added cost, as well as other design changes that are required to make DEF work. And yes, ag got an exception for a bunch of years, but the regulation is now catching up on new machines. Most equipment has doubled in price in the last 5 years or so from all manufacturers, in large part due to new engine requirements. A tractor you could have bought new for $200k is now north of $400k and don’t get me started on combines.