• naught101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Writers say all kinds of wack shit. Some of it sticks, some of it doesn’t. This one’s not really relevant to the OP’s question.

        • naught101@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Usage determines meaning, not age… if no one else picked up that meaning and ran with it, then it’s not really relevant to common usage.

          • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            It’s obviously relevant to a conversation about the meaning and history of the word, even if it’s not a common usage today. If William S. Burroughs said it, it’s worth taking a moment and making sure it actually fucking sunk in, and not just going eww that’s not the way mom makes it. When people use “punk” pejoratively, and they commonly do, they are certainly calling on this legacy. I hadn’t made the connection to homophobia before.

            • naught101@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              39 minutes ago

              I have never heard of people using the term “punk” with any connotation of “homosexual”. It’s interesting to learn that Burroughs (and perhaps a few others?) once used it that way, but I’m skeptical that that has meaningfully influenced broader common usage. “They are certainly calling on this legacy” seems like a claim that needs evidence?