“There is consumer pressure to back away from technology that is unnecessary to perform everyday tasks.”

  • bridgeburner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I wish. Instead, the EU releases continously new regulations which makes cars, especially small ones, prohibitively expensive, all in the name of safety. Cheap simple cars are a thing of the past, all new cars are stuffed with unnecessary but mandatory tech just so car manufacturers can make a higher profit.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      perceived safety

      they’re pushing LED headlights that are clearly dangerously blinding. like has nobody ever heard of a hill before jfc

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I wonder if someone sat down and really looked at the legistation and the engineering, if we couldn’t get away with cheaper solutions. Cars have something like a dozen purpose built computers now, can’t we just replace all that bs with a standard piece of hardware? Lane tracking, eye tracking, it’s like everything they do is bespoke.

    • kahjtheundedicated@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I really think there should be a middle zone between the quadricycle regulation (like the Citroen Ami, Renault Twizy, etc) and “normal” cars. Make a class for simple and cheap cars that are more capable than the quadricycles, but still have some conservative power and/or speed limits, size limits, and some safety standards.

      I’m imagining a class of vehicles that are like a modern take on the post-war economy cars like the Fiat 500, Citroen 2cv, VW beetle, etc. Something similar to the Japanese kei cars, but probably even more restrictive on power.