"We” as in consumers don’t use enough to hurt companies by divesting.

I think you’re confused by what divesting is. That’s us as business owners, not as customers (obviously we as customers can hit them simultaneously from the other side too).

Yes, individually it doesn’t hurt them much, but it becomes the death of a thousand cuts.

If you can put pressure on your pension provider, local government, church, favourite charity or any other organisation you care about to drop funds with them in entirely then all the better.

By all means do anything you can to reduce your individual carbon footprint

Divesting is not to do with that, it’s about hitting these companies right in the share price.

Which, as I said, is exactly why we should stop giving them our money. Divestment is a key thing people can will hurt these companies massively.

The most significant difference individuals can make is to create political and legal pressure by voting and protesting.

Well can also stop giving them our money. Reduce consumption of their products through alternatives and overall reduction. We can also divest our investments away from funds that include their shares.

How odd, here an electric will be £100-£150 and petrol you’re looking £250+

The post says you “you drive it” while you could say that for a push along it seems odd wording.

Before they had electric, that was the only type. It’s not fancy.

True that they did exist in the past, however unless you’ve got an old one they’re around twice the price of electric and more expensive to run. But, more than that, it points to you having enough garden to need petrol.

Look at Mr rich pants here, needing a ride on petrol mower. Most people round my way have small push along electric mowers.

Seems fine to me. It says that it’s the growth obsessed economy part that’s doing the tipping. The word “still” is being used in its adveb sense to mean that the transition to green energy won’t be enough to stop that tipping on its own.