Whatever you do, don’t take it to an airport, courthouse or a bank… Oh you’re in Canada. Never mind, you guys don’t have the police looking at kills like a video game score up there.

Sounds an awful lot like an article posted months ago. Old article? Someone publish a copy of an old article?

And yeah, those numbers are 1000% bogus.

If you read the post you would know it’s suggesting a completely different idea than the one you just refuted.

OVER the road and IN the road are not the same thing.

The benefits of covering highways are more immediately visible (provide shade to cool drivers and reduce blinding by the sun).

I agree those other places have benefits.

Covering deserts will help cool them and reduce evaporation of moisture on the surface, possibly restoring the livability of a more diverse ecosystem. However, panels in the desert get dusty quickly, don’t get cleaned by rain often, and would require water be brought in to clean them.

Covering parking lots would help cool cars, but I fear panels would be prime targets for vandalism.

That number is pretty hard to accept at face value. Let’s see them charge a car in seconds.

How does concrete emit CO2?

Rural crime gangs? Like white supremacists?

What are those other two unlabeled sections in the smaller diagram? Deck/patio?

On most roofs, those two sections you have panels on in the display would be facing opposing directions… do they face east/west? If they’re north/south you might want to rethink that setup.