deleted by creator
- 3 Posts
- 9 Comments
yes, and more importantly, normal Hydro plants could be updated to release water at selected times, to create “on-demand power”. The energy is stored in the water behind the dam. So conventional, already-existing hydro dams can perform a two-sided function: Storing water, and to release it on-demand. Like a battery that is refilled by nature.
“TOTAL LACK OF RESPECT for the Earth and the secrets that lie beneath the surface” had me for a moment. great comedy, lol
gandalf_der_12te@slrpnk.nettoGreen Energy@slrpnk.net•What Will We Do With Our Free Power?
2·1 year ago- non-urgent computing (AI training)
- non-urgent transports (i.e. construction material)
- steel, aluminum production
gandalf_der_12te@slrpnk.nettoGreen Energy@slrpnk.net•As electricity demand from data centers soars, Meta and Google are looking at a novel solution: harnessing clean heat far below Earth’s surface.
1·1 year agoThe thing I heard is that geothermal energy is actually only renewable on geological timescales, i.e. not really “renewable”. It’s just that there are very large reserves, so it’s not immediately obvious. But I can’t find a link rn.
gandalf_der_12te@slrpnk.nettoGreen Energy@slrpnk.net•Hydrogen Policy’s Narrow Path: Delusions And Solutions
1·1 year agoIt’s a conundrum, because while biofuels are expensive, there are ways to make them significantly cheaper, for example refining organic garbage and waste into fuels.
gandalf_der_12te@slrpnk.nettoGreen Energy@slrpnk.net•Hydrogen Policy’s Narrow Path: Delusions And Solutions
1·1 year agoactually, that’s not true. I built a hobby-grade hydrolysis machine in my garage for a total of $3. I can’t imagine hydrolysis machines to be significantly expensive in general.
The reason why they’re expensive today is because they’re completely over-engineered. But that’s not physics’ fault. It’s just someone seeking the “highest-quality product” instead of one that makes economic sense.
Just informing you: You can see the power output of PV panels by looking at the Watt number. It says something like 400 Wp (Watt peak - i.e. Watt under direct sunlight). Voltage is more or less irrelevant.
gandalf_der_12te@slrpnk.nettoGreen Energy@slrpnk.net•How a wave of giant solar projects could transform the Minnesota energy mix
4·1 year agosolar energy is the cheapest form of energy at this point. capitalism will drive the green energy revolution forward from now on.

Actually, I had a discussion about this with someone who really knows this stuff recently, and we figured that the inversion process isn’t actually that inefficient. The efficiencies achieved are often >95%, so there isn’t actually a lot of loss.