Trickle down economics … assumes that … B that people pay taxes proportionate to the amount of money they possess
Did Reagan assume a wealth tax? Who did?
Trickle down economics … assumes that … B that people pay taxes proportionate to the amount of money they possess
Did Reagan assume a wealth tax? Who did?
Most people who think voting will change anything also think it’s the only way to change anything. So it’s helpful to suggest specific direct action alternatives.
No, just the impression I got from what you said. Emphasis on the socialism, not on the computer program.
If we want to address all of those, then we’ll need higher pollution taxes too. Going after just one abstract category of greed will just encourage them to bullshit it into another category.
IMHO what makes it more appealing now than 20 years ago is the bonkers inequality. We could do a really bad job at socialism and still be better off than we are today. We’re just flushing trillions of dollars worth of value down the toilet on pointless nonsense that only like 100 people want.
“Ummm then we’re not an AI company”
Land Value Taxes are better for this in literally every way.
Call me an optimist but I think the closest thing to socialism we’ll ever see is socialism, not a cool new app.
What do you think is going to make those go away?