
Promo video here. A good place to start is 2m47s:
https://youtu.be/-QFUvAbdlJk&t=2m47s
Warning: Lots of MBA buzz words
Promo video here. A good place to start is 2m47s:
https://youtu.be/-QFUvAbdlJk&t=2m47s
Warning: Lots of MBA buzz words
I like the positive spin of this article, and I think it’s required to keep people motivated about renewables and their impact on climate change, but… another way to phrase this headline is, “Renewables not keeping up with new demand, much less yesterday’s ‘baseline’ requirement.”
It’s not as positive, believe me I know. And I am not poking at all of this amazing progress. My point is, this article tells me we aren’t actually putting a dent in the problem that got us to this point, which was - all by itself - going to keep temperatures moving higher. I feel we are moving into a feedback loop, with higher temps and modernizing countries leading to evermore increased energy consumption.
If renewables growth can’t keep up with demand growth, we need more, and more options, to give the next generation a fighting chance.
A novel variation on compressed air energy storage that should directly help replace a coal power plant by:
From a linked article discussing the proof of concept installation:
The DoE adds:
Compressed air energy storage currently tops out with round trip efficiencies of 67-71% in complex setups.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666202723002045# Search: “Compared to other adiabatic systems”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed-air_energy_storage#