I would hope to spend not much more than $300.
So what is the impetus of this price adversness
Do you expect to abuse the boots in a way that will impact it’s value and utility?
If you found a pair of boots that would last 10x longer, would you not be able to afford 4x the cost?
Ben eater is the absolute GOAT
His series is absolutely the best, most digestible primer for computation. Every concept is introduced in a very clear way that emphasizes it’s application.
Shin splints!
It’s not any harder. It provides a softer impact, so it should be easier.
Think walking on grass instead of pavement.
The scenario is the local population’s space requirements constrict the space that renewables can be built in, dense highrise world cast shadows across a solar field, and/or strip mining can create a space that would be awful for certain things.
It’s not like we just do one thing different, some people build out renewables and other people can build out housing and infrastructure in better ways. Do everything you can when you can as soon as you can.
Yes time in the context of labour and also time in terms of meeting targets to replace non-renewables.
Space may not be completely renewable, some is lost or the energy to remediate the space for use could be higher than the energy/utility we could gain from it.
Time, materials, and physical space? Ideally all of the last two is reusable/ renewable after the end of lifespan on the piece of infrastructure, but in current supply chain it is not.
Not when solar is generated. Creating and maintaining infrastructure, and using space for infrastructure.
Maybe your current problem isn’t unmet needs, but there are plenty of people who do have that problem.
It doesn’t make sense to shift all consumption to renewables if there’s no thought for efficient consumption or reducing consumption. There’s a finite amount of renewable energy that can be extracted, if consumption itself isn’t managed we can be right back in the same boat of unmet needs in another century.
Right but even renewable and abundant energy is scarce, in that it’s not infinite and mismanagement or inefficient use can mean it’s not there when you need it.
Communal kitchens, bathrooms and toilets mean that all the energy, materials and manpower saved from deduplicated construction and maintenance can go somewhere else.
Hmmm le guin
Right. This idea is impossible, since the groups would not be able to be isolated from eachother to the point of not having any commonality, while also sharing infrastructure and resources.
The teenagers would have parents. The sculptors need to eat, and would have relationships with producers and toolmakers and the rest of the town as a whole.
Human experiences aren’t atomic, and can’t really be separated into a neat tableaux like the one you are positing.
The link is there because that’s the licence he is publishing his comments under.
https://canvas.fediverse.events/#x=500&y=250&zoom=1
This thing is what he’s talking about
eventually getting being pushed out of a place can be tyrannical
The opposite is true. A single person staking out some resource is it’s own tyranny. If the single person’s wants are so far removed from the collective, why are they there?
It’s not magical, it’s the strategy that you use to solve the problems.
I think this sort of question comes from a capitalist, scarcity sort of mindset, even while he’s asking about anarchism.
In that system, it’s advantageous and encouraged to be selfish. There are a bunch of reasons for this, having wealth allows zero relationship transactions, theft or charity from you potentially deprive you of your means to live etc.
The opposite is encouraged in systems with less or no ownership or hierarchy, as power is derived from participation and cooperation. Respect is going to get you what you want.
No.
The act of trying to dictate the use of resources without negotiating with other stakeholders is the kind of parasitism that anarchism mitigates.
They can certainly have a voice if they come to the table and do the work of engaging with people.
If someone is petty or antagonistic, direct democracy will shut them down. Getting outvoted isn’t tyranny.
You just gave her training wheels for being terminally online
I would have done the same, good job.