

1·
3 months agoOf the 40 participants, 28 reported an increase in meat disgust.
A study on a group of 40 is an anecdote at best, a waste of resources at worst.
Reporting on it in on a big news website should be a crime, as it’s just a clickbait.
Of the 40 participants, 28 reported an increase in meat disgust.
A study on a group of 40 is an anecdote at best, a waste of resources at worst.
Reporting on it in on a big news website should be a crime, as it’s just a clickbait.
From another study with N=700:
IAT is phrenology of social studies. You can discard it as garbage. If a study is using IAT as methodology, it’s garbage done to gain some publication points.
You can read more about IAT: https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/1015-5759/a000778