• Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      A bigger machine without having to put a bigger diesel engine because a smaller diesel powerplant running electric motors will do the same job is better for the environment. Less diesel burned to do the same job when you are talking about industry that runs 24/7 means less pollution.

      • JacobCoffinWrites@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        If it takes off, it also represents a bit of demand destruction right? If this version works well and more efficiently companies might switch over when diesel is expensive and not switch back if it gets cheap.

    • eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      You do not at all understand the problem space of large systems in mining and construction, do you?

        • supersquirrel@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          That is a separate conversation from whether large industrial dozers are needed.

          If you think they aren’t needed you are mistaking your desire for degrowth broadly with the idea we don’t need large dozers as tools.

          What if I use a dozer to help install a new septic system that vastly reduces and essentially eliminates runoff into wetlands? Or a grid scale solar array? What if I use it to rebuild a bridge that has become unsafe? Like anything else it is complicated.

          Electric drive heavy industrial equipment is absoulutely solarpunk though, not the least because it sets the conditions for further electrification because the drive train is powered by an electric motor.