So me and some friends are currently planning a trip through Europe. Nothing is really set in stone yet, our first question is if we want to do a roadtrip with a camper-van or an Interrail trip.

I guess the advantage of a train would be, that it would be a lot more enjoyable to cover larger distances than with a camper. I thought, maybe it would be really cool, if we did like a larger tour through Europe, so I researched a bit and planned a hypothetical trip through Germany (where we live) to Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and back to Germany.

That sounds like a lot, but with the train routes, I looked up it would be doable with only 9 travel days, 4 of which would take the whole day (10-12 hours) and 5 of which would only take half a day (4-6 hours). I thought, that could be quite reasonable and it would be a great adventure type trip.

Do you think that could be cool, or would it get exhausting to quick?

  • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    Depends mostly on how much energy you have and how draining travelling is to you. For me it would be too much.

    I would recommend going either the Denmark - Sweden route or the Poland - Baltic route. And then really visit the countries you are travelling through, instead of only seeing the biggest cities one day and then leaving already. If you have a camper, then you have the option of seeing more of the countryside instead of being reliant on public transport, but the driving takes more energy than just sitting in a train. If you are mostly interested in visiting cities, then the train would probably be the better option, since you don’t need to find a parking space everywhere you go.

    And I also recommend night trains, they are a good way to travel and still have a full day for seeing stuff.