Surely a percentage of forested area is better for that, though? If you had two countries with the same total area and the same forested area but one of them had twice the population in its non-forested areas, the latter looks far worse on this scale despite using less land per person.
It kinda measures/operationalises some form of forest-urban relationship, something like a social forest scale
Surely a percentage of forested area is better for that, though? If you had two countries with the same total area and the same forested area but one of them had twice the population in its non-forested areas, the latter looks far worse on this scale despite using less land per person.