China’s efforts to slow land degradation and climate change by planting trees and restoring grasslands have shifted water around the country in huge, unforeseen ways, new research shows.

  • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I wonder how much of that percentage is influenced by those areas China was spray painting green to make it look like a forest

    • lefaucet@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Imagine if China will started paying Northern Africa to regreen in order to create air rivers that land in the north.

      • mikezane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        The areas of China with higher percentages of population is overall getting less water than before as there is more evaporation and China will need to account for this in their water distribution plans.

        • GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          No, your stupid and unhelpful comment aside. The environment has evolved and changed over millions of years in the most delicate balance. Sudden large scale ecological changes by man can have a wide reaching effect all around the globe so it’s hard to predict the outcome of something like this

          • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Skating dangerously close to the naturalistic fallacy with your stupid comment. Ecological changes from any source could be catastrophic for life on earth, people are not a necessary precondition.

  • Hux@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    It is very interesting, but I wish the article was a bit longer and was more specific about the comparative impacts of the water distribution effects it referred to.

    The article basically says “stuff changed, here are a couple of numbers”, but it didn’t elaborate on the actual changes and effects and how they compare to 20 or 50 years ago from either an ecological vantage point or human experience point of view.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Collectively, China’s ecosystem restoration initiatives account for 25% of the global net increase in leaf area between 2000 and 2017.

    Wow